Jan
26

The Mehrabian Myth – The Obsession with Body Language.

Graham Davies discusses “The Mehrabian Myth”

When coaching clients I tell them the words that you say and how they come out of your mouth are far more important than anything the rest of your body is doing.

Albert Mehrabian, a Professor at the University of California in Los Angeles, carried out a series of studies in the 1960s about the relative importance of the spoken word in face-to-face communication. The results of his research are typically expressed like this:

‘Only 7 per cent of the overall impact that you have in spoken communication comes from the actual words you say’.

By typically I mean totally grossly inaccurately. For about 30 years, through no fault of his, Professor Mehrabian’s research has been constantly misquoted. What you should know is the participants were only allowed to use one word at a time… with the only variation allowed being the tone adopted in saying those words. The 7% number only relates to situations where the speaker is talking about their feelings. Mehrabian has never suggested that non-verbal factors are more important than what you are actually saying.

So forget about gestures. The minds of the audience will be on what you are saying, not what your hands are doing.

Dec
02

Presentation Coaching With Graham Davies

Graham Davies has used all the experience he has gained from his time as President of the Cambridge Union, a criminal barrister and an international speaker to develop a highly transferable presentation methodology that can be adapted to any situation. He is the joint founder of the consultancy Straight Talking, which has a 15 year track record in presentation coaching for a spectacular client list, including Tesco, IBM, Porsche, KPMG and UBS. See Testimonials.

Graham’s unique approach make him a brutally sharp TV analyst of major political speeches.

Graham’s specialty is bespoke one-to-one coaching, advising Chairmen, CEOs, Directors and just about every other type of corporate executive. Otto Thoresen, the Chief Executive of AEGON UK, has said, “I would strongly recommend the Straight Talking approach to anyone who is serious about getting their message across.”

 

Graham Davies and his colleagues have been responsible for significant and measurable improvements in the performance of their clients:

“The work you have done on the structure, focus and delivery of our pitch presentations has been a fantastic success.  To have achieved the win rate we have in just 3 months is totally astonishing, and it could not have been done without Straight Talking.”
Hugh Ferrand, Institutional Client Director, Invesco Perpetual

He has achieved a unique position in the British market as the only consultant to successfully combine corporate work with long-term coaching of sporting celebrities and politicians, including 7 members of the Shadow Front Bench and many other political figures:

By using your techniques I can now prepare and perform every speech as if it were the Grand National.”
Richard Dunwoody MBE

“My live interview with Michael Portillo was several degrees less challenging than my coaching sessions with you.”
Zac Goldsmith

The key results of presentation coaching by Graham include:

  • Increased confidence
  • Greater individual impact
  • Rehab from addiction to PowerPoint

In short, Graham ensures that his clients can be as professional in their spoken communication as they are in every other aspect of their career. See more Testimonials.

Nov
22

Graham Davies on His Slide Commandments

Powerpoint is the single biggest cause of boring presentations in the 21st century.

No audience member ever walks out of a conference and says “What a great event that was. But it would have been even better if each speaker had used more slides. With more bullet-points on each slide. In a much smaller font.”

Here are my Slide Commandments:

1. Only use slides when they emphatically add impact to the spoken word.
2. Only use slides which are simple enough to be instantly absorbed.
3. Pictures and graphics are always more striking than written text.
4. Bullet-points are for amateurs (except for summaries).
5. Avoid narratives (they are for paper, not screens).

Oct
14

Graham Davies Explains Why Three is the Magic Number

Graham Davies suggests; as an experiment, try starting your next presentation with the words:

“I have 18 topics I would like to cover today…”

The most prevalent expression you then see on the faces of the audience is likely to be one of anger or despair. Make sure you have locked the exits.

The ideal number of points is three. For some reason, the human mind feels very comfortable with groups of three. Lists of three are memorable, even when the words in the list are not very striking in themselves:

‘Friends, Romans, Countrymen…’

‘Veni, Vidi, Vici’ (it even works in Latin)

‘Blood, Sweat and Tears’

Churchill actually said ‘Blood, sweat, toil and tears.’ But most people have forgotten the toil, because a list of three is easier to remember. If you really must include more, I reluctantly concede that you can probably get away with as many as five headings….as long as your writing is tight.

I urge you never to go beyond five headings. The human memory seems to run out at the same time as we run out of fingers on one hand to count with.

Think back to the last big speech or presentation you heard. Can you remember more than three headings? Can you even remember three?

If you can get your next audience to remember your Micro-Statement (the distilled essence of the presentation) and three headings that support it, then you will have done better than 99% of other presenters.

Oct
13

Graham Davies Tory PR Guru & The Presentation Coach at PSA11

Last weekend was spent with friends and fellow speakers at PSA11.

Some photos from the event courtesy of Ayd Instone (c)2011 AydInstone.com

Sep
19

It’s No Joke – Sarah Teather Fails The Clanger Test – Graham Davies Reviews Her Speech

The Liberal Democrats are now officially the most unfunny party in British politics. Have a look at Sarah Teather in action at their conference.

After she had finished, there was hardly a dry set in the house. Even her worst enemies could not bear to watch this self-immolation disguised as a speech.

Her material was ill-conceived, badly written, inadequately rehearsed and disastrously delivered. And it just wasn’t funny. This performance will greatly harm her political and presentational image.

Politicians love gags because a good one only takes a few seconds to deliver and can generate intense laughter followed by a storming round of applause. It is therefore more likely to get on the news than an entirely serious passage that could take more than a minute to get a single point across.

However, an effective gag requires very careful calculation which was totally absent during the Teather Tragedy.

There are 3 rules that politicians should follow so as to avoid Humour Horror during Party Conference Season

1. The concept behind any gag should be universally funny enough to appeal to the world beyond the Party Faithful in the Conference Hall.

2. The material has to precisely worded and ruthlessly rehearsed in front of a coach who has a professional ear for what will work under pressure.

3. It must pass the Clanger Test. It should be run past a group of experienced colleagues with sensitive ears who can tell you bluntly if it strikes a jarring note.

It will always be easier for us to make fun of politicians than it is for politicians to be funny themselves. And that is just how it should be.

The only way to guarantee that one of your speeches is funny is to hire an expert. Like me.

The rules are different for business speeches, contact me,  Graham Davies if you would like more information on coaching.